clinical study

AI-augmented review of CT cases to facilitate peer review of intracranial hemorrhage by practicing neuroradiologists

Materials & Methods

A retrospective study compared discrepancies between CT reports and AI-based detection of ICH. All non-contrast CT brain cases were collected over two months; cases reported as negative for ICH were included (n=1,812), while cases reported as suspicious for ICH (n=504) were excluded. Fellowship-trained NRs finalized all reports. An AI-tool trained to detect ICH was then run on the case set.

Results

Upon final consensus, 22 cases of ICH detected by AI were missed on finalized reports, yielding an error rate of 4.2% (22/ (504+22)).

Conclusions

AI-augmentation can flag potential discrepancies between scans and their reports, possibly improving the quantification of error rates among practicing radiologists.

Read Study

Aidoc Ask the Experts Webinar

Popular Posts

Article
A&E and AI: How Everlight Radiology Deploys AI to Support NHS Trust Care Expediency
Article
Three Key Takeaways from the 2023 PERT Consortium
Article
Nine Essential Considerations When Choosing a Clinical AI Vendor 
Article
Fostering Innovation & AI at a Health System: Novant Health

Stay Connected on AI Trends and Insights

Follow us on social

From Our Blog

View all

© Copyright 2023 Aidoc