clinical study

AI-augmented review of CT cases to facilitate peer review of intracranial hemorrhage by practicing neuroradiologists

Materials & Methods

A retrospective study compared discrepancies between CT reports and AI-based detection of ICH. All non-contrast CT brain cases were collected over two months; cases reported as negative for ICH were included (n=1,812), while cases reported as suspicious for ICH (n=504) were excluded. Fellowship-trained NRs finalized all reports. An AI-tool trained to detect ICH was then run on the case set.

Results

Upon final consensus, 22 cases of ICH detected by AI were missed on finalized reports, yielding an error rate of 4.2% (22/ (504+22)).

Conclusions

AI-augmentation can flag potential discrepancies between scans and their reports, possibly improving the quantification of error rates among practicing radiologists.

Read Study

Aidoc Ask the Experts Webinar

Popular Posts

Article
The Needle and the Damage: AI as Actionable Intelligence
Article
EHR and Imaging AI Integration: Decision Support Beyond Pixel Analysis
Article
AI for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Creating a Tech-Enabled Practice
Article
Considering Healthcare AI Implementation? Here are Three Pro-Tips

Subscribe to our Blog

Follow us on social

From Our Blog

View all

© Copyright 2023 Aidoc