The term “AI marketplace” gets thrown around a lot, but it rarely means the same thing twice. In fact, there are several flavors of marketplaces in healthcare today, and each comes with different promises, architectures and limitations. If you’re evaluating options, it’s critical to understand the tradeoffs. Because when it comes to clinical AI, the wrong model — or the wrong choice — can stall your strategy before it even starts.
These marketplaces focus on volume. They pull together dozens of third-party algorithms under one commercial umbrella. On the surface, the pitch is appealing: more choice, more flexibility and faster access to innovation.
But here’s the issue: These vendors don’t run the AI themselves. Each algorithm comes with its own integration path, its own support model and its own way of consuming and outputting data. That burden falls on your team.
Validation becomes a second challenge. Without performance oversight — especially on your own population data — every deployment becomes a guess. One that could carry clinical or legal risk.
Even if you clear those hurdles, the bigger problem is impact. Without shared infrastructure or orchestration, aggregators turn every new use case into a net-new IT project. There’s no workflow consistency across solutions, and no way to link them across care settings.
That matters because delivering real impact in a single disease state often requires a combination of capabilities: radiology AI for detection and triage, care coordination for timely intervention and patient management to ensure follow-up and treatment.
Marketplaces can’t support that kind of connected experience. You’re left with fragmented tools that solve for one moment in time — not the full patient journey.
This model is embedded within existing PACS environments, offering radiologists access to AI tools from inside their native workspace. On paper, it seems efficient, but there are tradeoffs here, too.
PACS companies aren’t AI companies. They don’t specialize in building infrastructure to support AI. They surface results, but they don’t orchestrate them. They typically don’t handle data normalization, logic routing or real-time monitoring.
If you’re a health system that doesn’t store certain studies in PACS, or you’re looking to extend AI into the Emergency Department (ED), cardiology or inpatient care, this model quickly hits its limits with workflow integration.
What’s missing is the intelligence layer between the scan and the action.
No matter how they’re packaged, most marketplaces are missing the same foundational elements. They focus on content, but lack the infrastructure needed to:
Without those layers, even the best algorithm ends up as another disconnected output, and health systems could stall AI strategy after one or two deployments.
If you’re evaluating a marketplace, don’t just ask how many algorithms are in the catalog. Ask:
These aren’t just implementation details. They’re what determine whether you’ll still be using the solution two years from now. If a vendor can’t answer these, they’re not ready to support enterprise-scale AI.
Aidoc experts, customers and industry leaders share the latest in AI benefits and adoption.
Explore how clinical AI can transform your health system with insights rooted in real-world experiences.
Learn how to go beyond the algorithm to develop a scalable AI strategy and implementation plan.
Explore how Aidoc can help increase hospital efficiency, improve outcomes and demonstrate ROI.
